3 T: the good, the bad and the ugly.

It is around 20 years since the first commercial 3 T MRI systems became available. The theoretical promise of twice the signal-to-noise ratio of a 1.5 T system together with a greater sensitivity to magnetic susceptibility-related contrast mechanisms, such as the blood oxygen level dependent effect that is the basis for functional MRI, drove the initial market in neuroradiology. However, the limitations of the increased field strength soon became apparent, including the increased radiofrequency power deposition, tissue-dependent changes in relaxation times, increased artifacts, and greater safety concerns. Many of these issues are dependent upon MR physics and workarounds have had to be developed to try and mitigate their effects. This article reviews the underlying principles of the good, the bad and the ugly aspects of 3 T, discusses some of the methods used to improve image quality and explains the remaining challenges and concerns.

Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.

HYPOTHESIS: A novel cochlea implant (CI) device magnet providing alignment to the static field of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will lead to reduced torque, longitudinal forces, and demagnetization effects. The image void and distortion will be comparable to those obtained with standard CI magnets. BACKGROUND: MRI investigations of CI users pose several challenges such as magnet dislocation, demagnetization, and may cause pain. The presence of a CI magnet within MRI field causes image distortions and may diminish the diagnostic value of an MRI procedure. Objective of this work is to evaluate magnetic forces and imaging properties of the novel CI magnet within 1.5 and 3T MRI. METHODS: Forces and torque of the novel CI magnet were measured in both 1.5 and 3T MRI and compared with the standard magnet in 1.5T. One cadaver head was implanted with the CI devices containing the novel and standard magnets in different configurations reflecting clinical scenarios and imaging properties were assessed and compared. RESULTS: In particular the torque has been reduced with the novel CI magnet in comparison to the standard one. Both CI magnets have not shown any signs of demagnetization. The image void and distortion was comparable between the two magnets for the main MRI clinical scanning protocols in 1.5T MRI. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CI magnet is safe to use for MRI investigations of CI users in 3T MRI without a need for bandaging and has acceptable level of image artefacts.

Will MRI of gastrointestinal function parallel the clinical success of cine cardiac MRI?

Cine cardiac MRI is generally accepted as the "gold-standard" for functional myocardial assessment. It only took a few years after the development of commercial MRI systems for functional cardiac imaging to be developed, with electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated cine imaging first reported in 1988. The function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is more complex to study compared to the heart. However, the idea of having a non-invasive tool to study the GI function that also allows the concurrent assessment of different aspects of this function has become more and more attractive in the gastroenterological field. This review summarises key literature of the last 5 years to describe the current status of MRI in respect to the evaluation of GI function, highlighting the gaps and challenges and the future prospects. As the clinical application of a new technique requires that its clinical utility is confirmed by demonstration of its ability to enable clinicians to make a diagnosis and/or predict the treatment response, this review also considers whether or not this has been achieved, and how MRI has been validated against techniques currently recognised as the gold standard in clinical practice.

Improved artery-vein separation with acceleration-dependent preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare the use of acceleration-dependent and velocity-dependent flow-preparation for non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA), investigating both image quality and the ability to discriminate between arteries and veins. We develop an acceleration-dependent NCE-MRA method known as acceleration dependent vascular anatomy for non-contrast-enhanced MRA (ADVANCE-MRA). METHODS: Acceleration-dependent and velocity-dependent images were acquired using a constant and pulsatile flow-phantom and from the lower legs of six healthy volunteers and one patient with peripheral vascular disease. The volunteer images were assessed both by quantitative signal measurements and qualitative scoring by a radiologist. RESULTS: In the phantom, acceleration-dependent preparation depicted pulsatile but not constant flow, while velocity-dependent preparation depicted both. In the volunteers and the patient, the velocity-dependent preparation was unable to separate the arterial and venous signals completely, with some overlap of arterial and venous signals for all acquired flow sensitizations whereas the acceleration-dependent preparation gave complete artery-vein separation over a wide range of flow sensitizations. Acceleration-dependent preparation received the best overall qualitative scores for arterial image quality and venous contamination. CONCLUSION: Acceleration-dependent NCE-MRA improves arterial image quality and reduces venous contamination, compared with velocity-dependent NCE-MRA, and warrants further investigation in patients.

Initial clinical evaluation of a non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography method in the distal lower extremities.

PURPOSE: To report the initial experience and diagnostic performance applying a novel flow-dependent non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (NCE-MRA) method, in patients with suspected peripheral vascular disease, in comparison with established contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA). METHODS: The lower legs of 34 patients were imaged at 1.5 T with both NCE-MRA and CE-MRA. The NCE-MRA method consisted of a cardiac-gated balanced-SSFP sequence with controllable flow-suppression preparation. Flow-suppressed and unsuppressed datasets were subtracted to obtain angiograms. Two experienced radiologists assessed both NCE-MRA and CE-MRA images, first independently and then in consensus to resolve significant disagreements. Signal loss, vessel conspicuity, vascular disease, venous contamination, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence were assessed. RESULTS: Using the CE-MRA as the "gold standard," the per-segment sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant disease were 81.7% and 90.9%, respectively. Mean diagnostic confidence (scale 0-4) was 3.4 for NCE-MRA and 3.9 for CE-MRA. Most vessel segments were well visualized but the popliteal arteries often suffered some technique-related signal loss. CONCLUSIONS: The NCE-MRA method was able to visualize most vessel segments with good or excellent confidence, few artifacts, and excellent background suppression, giving moderate agreement with CE-MRA. However, some segments were poorly visualized, probably due to flow profile distortion in these patients.